Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 12:25

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Discovery of a Lifetime: Student Discovers Ancient “Living Fossil” Underneath Rock - SciTechDaily
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
How to reduce your risk of melanoma and other skin cancers - KSLTV.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Scientists Are Close to Replicating the First Living Thing - Yahoo
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Why are people becoming increasingly hostile to pro-lifers? I am pro-life.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Administration to phase out NIH support of HIV clinical guidelines - The Washington Post
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What is the best comeback you used on someone?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Harvard study warns: Common napping habits linked to higher death risk - Times of India
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.